According to many, everyone in society can have a sense of identity. Everyone except white males, that is. Being proud to be of European descent is increasingly being dubbed “racist” by society. Groups such as the alt-right and Identity Evropa have been written off by the Left as being radicalized, hate driven neo-Nazi organizations filled with white supremacists. Nobody is willing to actually have a conversation. Nobody wants to talk about things that may offend somebody. Everyone is willing to accept diversity, except when the discussion is initialized by those with dissenting opinions.
Remember, it’s important to have discourse on these sensitive issues. The Left’s realm of political correctness has overridden that fact. It’s become off-limits to talk about race relations, or race in general, as if it doesn’t exist. Well, race exists, and it’s the people who permeate “acceptance” that tend to look unfavorably on white society.
The ideal that it is simply “okay to be white” is NOT a radical thought, although Leftists see it as such. Even as social and political movements such as “Black Lives Matter” and “Antifa” are becoming increasingly popular among young Leftist “activists,” they’re riddled with hatred, ambiguity, and violence against white America. They display high levels of hatred and hostility. In other words, they’re hypocrites. To say that “social justice warriors” are not radically racist would be factually wrong according to definition. Organizations who stress “equality” and “non-discriminatory” actions or rhetoric are those spewing hateful messages.
One of the founders of the BLM movement in Toronto, Yusra Khogali, says whites are “sub-human,” that they’re “genetic defects,” and should be “wiped out.” Khogali posted these comments on her Facebook page, saying “Whiteness is not humaness, in fact, white skin is sub-human,” she wrote. “All phenotypes exist within the black family and white ppl are a genetic defect of blackness.” She then cogitates wiping out the white race. “Black ppl simply through their dominant genes can literally wipe out the white race if we had the power to.”
This type of speech mirrors that of American eugenicists who, in the first third of the twentieth century, claimed that native whites were superior to not only blacks, but also to immigrants of Eastern and Southern Europe. Modern day “progressives” such as Yusra Khogali are in fact regressive, hypocritical, and flat-out racist.
The sad fact of the matter is that most of the world seems to agree with the statement that it is “not okay to be white.” It’s common to see a tweet on Twitter by some teenage Marxist that reads something along the lines of, “f*ck white people, lol.” It’s become all too common, as if the modern population of white people is at-large to blame for slavery, Jim Crow, or other discriminatory actions of the past. This should not be normalized, yet it is. And nobody seems to care.
White genocide is not a “conspiracy theory,” even if Wikipedia denounces it as such. In South Africa, white farmers are being murdered simply for being white. One couple, British born Sue Howarth and her husband Robert Lynn were woken at 2am by three men breaking into a window of their remote farm in Dullstroom, a small town in the northeast of South Africa, about 240km from the nearest capital city. The couple was “tied up, stabbed, and tortured with a blowtorch for several hours.” The couple was then abducted by the three men and driven to a roadside where they were both shot. Mrs. Howarth was fatally shot twice in the head, and Mr. Lynn was shot in the neck. Miraculously, he survived, and managed to flag down a passer-by early that morning. Police say that Mrs. Howarth was “unrecognizable” from her injuries, had multiple skull fractures, horrific gun-shot wounds, and “horrific” burns to her breasts.
This is not an isolated incident.
Unfortunately, this kind of hate crime is not uncommon in South Africa. These “farm attacks” are happening every day. In 2017, for example, 64-year-old Nicci Simpson was tortured with a power drill during an attack involving three men at her home on a farm in the Vaal area, about two hours’ drive from Johannesburg.
When paramedics arrived, they found three dead dogs, and the woman lying in a pool of blood. “They used a drill to torture her,” police spokesman Lungelo Dlamini said.
Official statistics on farm attacks are non-existent, due to what human rights groups have described as a “cover-up” by the notoriously corrupt — and potentially complicit — South African government.
Another African nation, Zimbabwe, has also had its fair share in white genocidal attacks. Zimbabwe President Robert Mugabe has said that people who murdered white farmers during a government-sanctioned purge in the 2000s will “never be prosecuted.” Zimbabwe implemented a controversial land reform program in 2000 that saw squatters invade and seize hundreds of white-owned farms around the country. The violent seizures resulted in the murder of several white farmers, with many more displaced, and close associates of Mugabe given large chunks of land.
White genocide refers to slow removal and replacement of a population through nonviolent means. So just because there’re no “white concentration camps” in the world does not mean that white genocide does not exist. New racial demographics are reshaping countries worldwide.
I’m not only asserting the fact that white privilege is an at-large imbecilic idea in the greater American society, I’m asserting that it simply doesn’t exist in the modern day United States. White privilege refers to the standing notion that “unearned advantages and benefits” are given to White persons based on a system that was “normed on the experiences, values, and perceptions” of White persons.
There is no “white privilege.” There is only black underachievement. There, I said it. How can there possibly be white privilege in a majority white country? Privilege is for the few, not the many. Think of it this way: if 12 white people apply for one position, the fact is that white privilege does not play a role. However, being black does establish the grounds for privilege in such circumstances.
For example, if ‘brand x’ is launching a new product with a black celebrity as an endorser, it makes sense for brand x to hire some black people to assure the message is communicated properly. In America, everyone knows the white culture. Brand x could hire someone from any ethnicity to speak to whites. White privilege again does not play a role.
However, there is a communication difference between classes that overrides the basis of race. When a black person speaks the language of the upper-class, other black people will tell them they’re talking “white.” THAT is privilege, when everything associated with wealth and greatness become “white.” Alas, it’s created by blacks. They’re the only ones to do this.
The notion of “success privilege” is not farfetched. When you take the habits of a successful person, you ultimately gain the privilege of the successful. Barack Obama is a black male. Barack Obama was also the President of the United States for 8 years. To say that a white male is more privileged than Barack Obama is ludicrous. “The privilege you get is the privilege you create.”
Where is the “white privilege” for a homeless white person? It doesn’t exist. When a white person is on the sidewalk begging for money, how does their privilege help them? It doesn’t.
When the new Muslim girl or handicap person joins a new school or job atmosphere, everyone walks on eggshells as not to offend them. Nobody says about a new white person, “be nice, they’re white!” That just doesn’t happen. Nobody cares. It is only the odd, unique, or different that is afforded privilege. And Black people are different.
Since we live amongst a white majority, images in movies or on TV tend to reflect that of the greater society. When people create, they tend to create things as they see themselves and it is the “white people” creating these things.
If black people created more, they’d create their own image as well. The fact of the matter is that black people are habitual consumers, so they have to consume what white people are creating.
Here’s the truth; blacks are more likely to spend $200 on a pair of Jordan’s than to spend $200 investing in the stock market. Instant gratification vs long term gratification.
Children who’re born into wealth is because their predecessor was planning generationally. Blacks plan day-to-day. Until blacks start planning two lifetimes ahead, they will never rise from the rut.
Undoubtedly, the black community in this country has suffered systemically in the past. But nowadays it’s stemmed from inside the community, not outside influence. The destruction of the American black family has played a role in anti-white sentiments. Blacks are not disproportionally thrown in jail for being black. They’re thrown in jail proportionally with the rate of crime which they commit.
Liberal policy has devastated the black family unit. It’s well known how in 1965 Daniel Patrick Moynihan, assistant secretary of labor to Democrat President Johnson, warned that the black family was on the verge of a “complete breakdown” because of growing illegitimacy rates: in 1963 the out-of-wedlock birth rate for whites was 3 percent, and for blacks it was 23.6 percent.
Since more blacks were being born into unmarried homes, more blacks were becoming completely dependent on the welfare system. Historically, Blacks represented a small percentage of the U.S. population, yet disproportionately represented the percentage of people relying on governmental assistance to survive. To this day, the problem persists. In fact, it’s gotten worse.
Most black babies are being born into single parent homes. This equates for those children to grow up into a life of poverty and crime. If black lives truly matter, as Democrats shout at the top of their lungs, why don’t they promulgate policies that encourage blacks to get married before they have kids? Blacks voting overwhelmingly for Democrats over the past half century is the quintessential definition of political suicide.
We are not a society of equal opportunity, we’re a society of relative opportunity.
Affirmative action at one point made sense. Though it was a noble idea for compensation in the 1960s, today’s America is more divided by class and income difference than by race. In the 60’s, affirmative action was a form of compensation to underrepresented minorities in society, and therefore accepted as such. Today, however, the demographics of this country are changing so drastically that many people are speculating that the white population will become the minority as early as 2050.
Affirmative action does not hold the same moral and social value that it once did. The person who voluntarily migrated from El Salvador to the United States—who may even have broken the law in order to do so—qualifies for preferential treatment once regularized. Ditto the son of a Nigerian general now settled in this country. Ditto the entire female gender. Affirmative action has severed its connection to the deepest wrong in American history and effloresced into a system whereby citizens are bestowed or denied preferences or benefits according to a complex hierarchy of race, ethnicity, national origin, and sex.
Johnson’s assumption that non-black Americans all enjoyed more or less equivalent opportunities “to learn and grow, to work and share in society, to develop their abilities” is poignantly out of date.
Today, society is sending a message. It is not okay to be white. In fact, it’s prejudicial to simply be of European heritage. All white people enjoy the many benefits of white privilege, and systemic racism exists.
I want to throw up.
I’ll say it again: It’s okay to be white. Even if they tell you its not.